Advisory

Strategic decisions for leadership, with explicit trade-offs as the criterion: the decision stays yours, the method informs it.

Low risk · Fixed scope

What to build and in what order, with limited resources

Explicit business and architecture trade-offs to decide between competing product options: the decision stays yours, the method informs it.

Duration: depends on the scope of the options at play · Includes: option mapping + trade-off evaluation

Scope and timeline are adjusted per case, not published as a closed package.

1
Options and constraints mapping
What’s being considered, what resources are really available.
2
Trade-off evaluation
Business impact and technical cost, together, with explicit reasoning.
3
Roadmap and follow-up
Verifiable milestones + review points set in advance.
Low risk · Fixed scope

How your product sustains itself, before you invest in building it

Diagnosis of the current business model (or its absence), identification of the critical assumptions behind it, and a sustainability financial plan before committing major resources.

Duration: depends on the model's complexity · Includes: revenue/cost mapping + critical assumption identification

Scope and timeline are adjusted per case, not published as a closed package.

1
Diagnosing the current model
What model exists today, even if implicit, and the assumptions holding it up.
2
Design and validation
Prioritizing which assumptions to validate first, with cheap, concrete tests, not a full launch.
3
Sustainability financial plan
A realistic projection with scenarios, and whether external financing makes sense, and of what kind.
Low risk · Fixed scope

Security, quality, and scalability for what your team already built with AI

More and more teams are building real solutions (e-commerce, internal tools) with AI, with no prior technical experience. It works, until it needs to scale, stay secure, or be maintained: that's where the risks nobody without experience can see in time start to show up. I assess how solid what was built actually is, and what it needs to hold up in real production.

Duration: depends on the scope of the solution being assessed · Includes: technical review + security assessment + scaling plan

Scope and timeline are adjusted per case, not published as a closed package.

1
Technical review of what was built
How solid the architecture actually is, and where the real security and quality risks are.
2
Risk-based prioritization
What needs fixing before scaling, and what can wait.
3
Scaling plan
How to sustain the solution in real production, with or without an in-house technical team.
Start a conversation